Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kamek98
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/6/0); ended 21:16, 22 March 2012 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW Frank | talk 21:16, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination
[edit]Kamek98 (talk · contribs) – Very active and concerned. Not that all-around type of editor. Familiar with Wikipedia and it's functions and purposes. Likes to source things. Likes to work in groups and get things done fast. Can edit grammar professionally. Still some flaws in his abilities. Eric 19:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: Patrol, Protect, Undelete, Override-Antispoof, Move, Block, Rename User, Create Account, and Check User.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: I'm more involved in the creation of lesser known pages and supporting articles. I am more involved in electronics and military warfare from Asia and China, etc. I like to make the articles more reliable and more grammar corrected.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: Yes. I have seen some name calling with Joetri95 or something like that when the project Dynasty Warriors 7 was being created. A lot of the time my work is brought down because I'm in the middle of it and someone might not like it. I also have most images I post and verify brought down for unprofessional looks, etc.
General comments
[edit]- Links for Kamek98: Kamek98 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Kamek98 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support
[edit]
Oppose
[edit]- WP:NOTNOW. Far too few edits to gain an understanding of User's patterns. Achowat (talk) 19:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NOTNOW. Two hundred edits is not enough. Terse answers to questions. Talk page. Glrx (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Very few edits show lack of experience. I don't think even a "rollback" right would be made available at this stage. —Vensatry (Ping me) 20:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not being able to correctly copy the list of extra tools available to an admin = no real understanding (i.e., including Rename User and Check User in the answer above). QU TalkQu 20:44, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NOTNOW - This RfA has been transcluded for nearly two hours, and the candidate has still not figured out how to fix the bright red template errors above. Less than 250 edits. —SW— gossip 21:05, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NOTNOW. This user clearly doesn't understand what being an admin is about. Not to mention that the ability to CheckUser and Rename Users require the Check User and Bureaucrat flags something that is usually handed out to experienced admins.—cyberpower ChatOnline 21:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.